Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 6 Oct 1999 22:34:58 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
"Debus, David" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is there any way to correlate or compare performance between HP-3000s and
> HP-UX machines. For instance, how
> would the following HP-UX compare?:
>
> HP9000 L-Class (L1000) 2-way
> 1 x 440Mhz CPU (upgradeable to 2)
> 256 MB Memory
> 9GB Disk
> HP-UX11.0
>
> This would be used as an Internet Portal server and is said to be able to
> support '33 pages/sec'
>
> Any input would be appreciated
Well, I can't directly address the web performance question, but I can
tell you that we have a HP9000 K570/400 - with 4 processors and fiber
channel Nike disk drives running a commerical application on top of Oracle
that is a dead horse next to our lightening quick HP3000 969/120 - with 1
processor. For example, we can produce invoices at 26/sec on MPE and
4/sec on HP-UX. And management thought we'd get *away* from batch
processing on the new HP-UX/Oracle based system - Ha!.
>
> Thanks
--
Richard L Gambrell
Database Administrator and
Consultant to Computing Services at UTC
** UTC business:
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
113 Hunter Hall, Dept. 4454
615 McCallie Ave., Chattanooga, TN 37403-2598
fax: 423-755-4025
phone: 423-755-4551 email: [log in to unmask]
** other business or private:
voice mail/phone: 423-874-0261 email: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|