Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 27 Jan 1995 16:16:09 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Jan 1995, Isaac Blake wrote:
> I agree that the information should be available, but I strongly feel HP
> should do a lot of work in this area. For example, cleaning up
^^^^^^^^^^^
> users/groups/accounts after system/patch installations, enhancing the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ;PASS= parameter of the NEW+ALTACCT/GROUP/USER commands to allow for
> random password generations, etc...
We spend a great deal of time trying to keep our system(s) secure. I
have often wondered why HP does such a sloppy job in this regard. Many
hours of rework are created by a single patch.
If nothing else, I consider this to be common courtesy. I really
appreciate all the vendors who take the time to create clean
installation processes for their products.
Regards,
--- John Joerger ([log in to unmask])
The pessimist says the glass as half empty. The optimist says the
glass as half full. The Re-engineer says you have twice as much
glass as necessary!
|
|
|