HP3000-L Archives

July 2001, Week 1

HP3000-L@RAVEN.UTC.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Catherine Litten <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 5 Jul 2001 18:23:37 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
I have set up a batch job like Dennis has suggested and our operators are
using this and it works just fine.

However I do agree with you Donna, it is an operations process.

 ============================================
Catherine Litten, (www.littenfamily.com)
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Valley Presbyterian Hospital (www.valleypres.org)
15107 Vanowen Street, Van Nuys, Ca  91405-4597
Phone (818) 782-6600 x 2140     Fax (818) 902-5202
============================================
The thoughts, comments, and opinions expressed herein are mine and do not
reflect those of my employer, or anyone else.
============================================



-----Original Message-----
From: HP-3000 Systems Discussion [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of Dennis Heidner
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 12:01 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: inetd and operator.sys, part 2


Easy way to solve it.  Create a batch file that does the inetd.net -k.
Setup the job to run as manager.sys.  Change the file security to xeq only
and put a lockword on it.  Anybody that has a need to shut it down can do
so... by stream the job.

The job can include the inetd.net -k,  a pause,  set a variable if JINETD
is still running.  If still running, then it can do an ABORTJOB.
************************
> >can operator.sys do a 'inetd -k'?  or does that only work
> >for manager.sys?        - d
>
> <snip>
>
> Maybe an SIB item?

this is an intriguing thought?  should inetd be modified to allow someone
other than (literally) manager.sys to 'use' it.  given doug werth's
comments (With inetd, even a user with SM capability cannot kill inetd.
It appears to be hardcoded for MANAGER.SYS.  My guess would be that it
started as source from UNIX that was programmed to look for root user (or
UID 0) and chose to replace it with the closest MPE equivalent of
MANAGER.SYS or UID 1.), it makes me wonder if it's possible.  i believe
there is some argument for enabling operator.sys access to inetd though.
what do 'we' think?         - d

--
Donna Garverick     Sr. System Programmer
925-210-6631        [log in to unmask]

>>>MY opinions, not Longs Drug Stores'<<<

* To join/leave the list, search archives, change list settings, *
* etc., please visit http://raven.utc.edu/archives/hp3000-l.html *

ATOM RSS1 RSS2